Employment

Method of travel to work

About this topic

Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.

This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.

Interpretation notes

  • Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
  • It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
  • The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.

Key insight

In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in King River, accounting for 65% (89 people). This share was lower than Albany (C) (69.6%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 86 people and 15 percentage points.

Section overview

Method of travel to work

King River - Employed persons (Usual residence)

This table summarises method of travel to work for King River in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Albany (C) and change since 2016.

Method of travel to work snapshot

2021 distribution by category for King River, with comparison markers for Albany (C).

King River
Albany (C)

Train

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Bus

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Tram

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Ferry

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Taxi/ride-share

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Car - as driver

2021 count

89

% of total

65.0%

Change from 2016

+15.0pp

Car - as passenger

2021 count

7

% of total

5.1%

Change from 2016

+5.1pp

Truck

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Motorbike

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Bicycle

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Walked only

2021 count

11

% of total

8.0%

Change from 2016

+8.0pp

Other

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Worked at home

2021 count

11

% of total

8.0%

Change from 2016

-42.0pp

Did not go to work

2021 count

19

% of total

13.9%

Change from 2016

+13.9pp

Not stated

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Data table

Method of travel to work for King River. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Albany (C).

Method of travel to work for King River. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Albany (C).
Method of travel to work for King River. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Albany (C).
Category20212016Change
Count%Albany (C)%Count%Albany (C)%Countpp
Train00.0%0.0%00.0%0.1%00.0pp
Bus00.0%0.9%00.0%0.9%00.0pp
Tram00.0%0.0%00.0%0.0%00.0pp
Ferry00.0%0.0%00.0%0.0%00.0pp
Taxi/ride-share00.0%0.2%00.0%0.3%00.0pp
Car - as driver8965.0%69.6%350.0%69.8%+86+15.0pp
Car - as passenger75.1%5.2%00.0%5.6%+7+5.1pp
Truck00.0%0.7%00.0%0.9%00.0pp
Motorbike00.0%0.3%00.0%0.5%00.0pp
Bicycle00.0%0.5%00.0%0.8%00.0pp
Walked only118.0%2.1%00.0%2.7%+11+8.0pp
Other00.0%1.5%00.0%1.5%00.0pp
Worked at home118.0%6.5%350.0%4.9%+8-42.0pp
Did not go to work1913.9%11.9%00.0%10.8%+19+13.9pp
Not stated00.0%0.5%00.0%1.2%00.0pp
Total employed persons aged 15+137100.0%100.0%6100.0%100.0%+1310.0pp