Employment
Method of travel to work
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, working from home was the most common travel method among employed residents in Eaglemont, accounting for 39.5% (826 people). This share was higher than Banyule (C) (33.4%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in working from home, which increased by 694 people and 32.8 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Eaglemont - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises method of travel to work for Eaglemont in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Banyule (C) and change since 2016.
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Eaglemont, with comparison markers for Banyule (C).
Train
2021 count
75
% of total
3.6%
Change from 2016
-13.9pp
75
3.6%
-13.9pp
Bus
2021 count
5
% of total
0.2%
Change from 2016
-0.6pp
5
0.2%
-0.6pp
Tram
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Ferry
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Car - as driver
2021 count
779
% of total
37.2%
Change from 2016
-18.6pp
779
37.2%
-18.6pp
Car - as passenger
2021 count
67
% of total
3.2%
Change from 2016
-1.0pp
67
3.2%
-1.0pp
Truck
2021 count
4
% of total
0.2%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
4
0.2%
0.0pp
Motorbike
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.4pp
0
0.0%
-0.4pp
Bicycle
2021 count
21
% of total
1.0%
Change from 2016
-0.4pp
21
1.0%
-0.4pp
Walked only
2021 count
63
% of total
3.0%
Change from 2016
+0.5pp
63
3.0%
+0.5pp
Other
2021 count
19
% of total
0.9%
Change from 2016
-0.2pp
19
0.9%
-0.2pp
Worked at home
2021 count
826
% of total
39.5%
Change from 2016
+32.8pp
826
39.5%
+32.8pp
Did not go to work
2021 count
229
% of total
10.9%
Change from 2016
+2.0pp
229
10.9%
+2.0pp
Not stated
2021 count
5
% of total
0.2%
Change from 2016
-0.4pp
5
0.2%
-0.4pp
Chart view
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
-269
-13.9pp
Bus
-10
-0.6pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
0
0.0pp
Car - as driver
-320
-18.6pp
Car - as passenger
-15
-1.0pp
Truck
+1
0.0pp
Motorbike
-7
-0.4pp
Bicycle
-7
-0.4pp
Walked only
+14
+0.5pp
Other
-3
-0.2pp
Worked at home
+694
+32.8pp
Did not go to work
+54
+2.0pp
Not stated
-7
-0.4pp
Data table
Method of travel to work for Eaglemont. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Banyule (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Banyule (C)% | Count | % | Banyule (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 75 | 3.6% | 3.5% | 344 | 17.5% | 14.8% | -269 | -13.9pp |
| Bus | 5 | 0.2% | 0.9% | 15 | 0.8% | 1.7% | -10 | -0.6pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Car - as driver | 779 | 37.2% | 42.8% | 1,099 | 55.8% | 59.8% | -320 | -18.6pp |
| Car - as passenger | 67 | 3.2% | 2.4% | 82 | 4.2% | 3.3% | -15 | -1.0pp |
| Truck | 4 | 0.2% | 0.3% | 3 | 0.2% | 0.4% | +1 | 0.0pp |
| Motorbike | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 7 | 0.4% | 0.4% | -7 | -0.4pp |
| Bicycle | 21 | 1.0% | 0.6% | 28 | 1.4% | 1.1% | -7 | -0.4pp |
| Walked only | 63 | 3.0% | 2.2% | 49 | 2.5% | 2.3% | +14 | +0.5pp |
| Other | 19 | 0.9% | 0.8% | 22 | 1.1% | 1.0% | -3 | -0.2pp |
| Worked at home | 826 | 39.5% | 33.4% | 132 | 6.7% | 4.3% | +694 | +32.8pp |
| Did not go to work | 229 | 10.9% | 12.4% | 175 | 8.9% | 9.7% | +54 | +2.0pp |
| Not stated | 5 | 0.2% | 0.3% | 12 | 0.6% | 0.8% | -7 | -0.4pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 2,093 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1,968 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +125 | 0.0pp |