Cultural diversity
Ancestry
About this topic
Ancestry describes a person's cultural association and ethnic background, and Census respondents can report more than one ancestry. It is a broader cultural measure than country of birth because it can reflect family heritage across generations.
This topic helps show the size and diversity of cultural groups in an area, including groups whose members were born in Australia. Because multiple ancestries can be reported, ancestry totals can exceed the total population, so it is best read with birthplace, language used at home, and religion.
Interpretation notes
- People can report up to two ancestries, so category counts represent responses rather than a single unduplicated person count, while percentages are shown against the total population.
- ABS advises that ancestry is best used with birthplace and language, because ancestry alone is a broad measure of ethnicity and cultural background.
- The 2021 form added separate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mark boxes, so those categories need caution in over-time comparison.
Key insight
In 2021, the largest ancestry groups among residents in Fig Tree Pocket were English, Australian and Irish.
Section overview
Ancestry - Ranked by size
Fig Tree Pocket - Total persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises ancestry for Fig Tree Pocket in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Brisbane (C) and change since 2016.
Ancestry - Ranked by size snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Fig Tree Pocket, with comparison markers for Brisbane (C).
English
Australian
Irish
Scottish
German
Chinese
Indian
South African
Italian
Dutch
Chart view
Ancestry - Ranked by size change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
English
+16
-2.5pp
Australian
0
-2.1pp
Irish
+31
-0.2pp
Scottish
-1
-0.9pp
German
+25
+0.2pp
Chinese
+110
+2.3pp
Indian
+118
+2.5pp
South African
+15
+0.2pp
Italian
-23
-0.8pp
Dutch
-27
-0.8pp
Data table
Ancestry for Fig Tree Pocket. Ancestry - Ranked by size. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Brisbane (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Brisbane (C)% | Count | % | Brisbane (C)% | Count | pp | |
| English | 1,715 | 39.5% | 33.3% | 1,699 | 42.0% | 33.6% | +16 | -2.5pp |
| Australian | 1,251 | 28.8% | 27.9% | 1,251 | 30.9% | 28.1% | 0 | -2.1pp |
| Irish | 561 | 12.9% | 12.3% | 530 | 13.1% | 13.4% | +31 | -0.2pp |
| Scottish | 530 | 12.2% | 10.2% | 531 | 13.1% | 10.3% | -1 | -0.9pp |
| German | 276 | 6.4% | 5.2% | 251 | 6.2% | 5.3% | +25 | +0.2pp |
| Chinese | 268 | 6.2% | 7.7% | 158 | 3.9% | 7.2% | +110 | +2.3pp |
| Indian | 218 | 5.0% | 3.7% | 100 | 2.5% | 3.5% | +118 | +2.5pp |
| South African | 124 | 2.9% | 0.8% | 109 | 2.7% | 0.7% | +15 | +0.2pp |
| Italian | 119 | 2.7% | 3.4% | 142 | 3.5% | 3.2% | -23 | -0.8pp |
| Dutch | 65 | 1.5% | 1.5% | 92 | 2.3% | 1.4% | -27 | -0.8pp |
Excludes ancestries with fewer than 10 responses (multi-response).