Cultural diversity
Ancestry
About this topic
Ancestry describes a person's cultural association and ethnic background, and Census respondents can report more than one ancestry. It is a broader cultural measure than country of birth because it can reflect family heritage across generations.
This topic helps show the size and diversity of cultural groups in an area, including groups whose members were born in Australia. Because multiple ancestries can be reported, ancestry totals can exceed the total population, so it is best read with birthplace, language used at home, and religion.
Interpretation notes
- People can report up to two ancestries, so category counts represent responses rather than a single unduplicated person count, while percentages are shown against the total population.
- ABS advises that ancestry is best used with birthplace and language, because ancestry alone is a broad measure of ethnicity and cultural background.
- The 2021 form added separate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mark boxes, so those categories need caution in over-time comparison.
Key insight
In 2021, the largest ancestry groups among residents in Robertson (Qld) were Chinese, English and Australian.
Section overview
Ancestry - Ranked by size
Robertson (Qld) - Total persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises ancestry for Robertson (Qld) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Brisbane (C) and change since 2016.
Ancestry - Ranked by size snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Robertson (Qld), with comparison markers for Brisbane (C).
Chinese
English
Australian
Indian
Irish
Scottish
Taiwanese
Italian
Korean
German
Chart view
Ancestry - Ranked by size change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Chinese
-242
-3.3pp
English
+59
+1.8pp
Australian
-37
-0.3pp
Indian
+45
+1.3pp
Irish
+18
+0.7pp
Scottish
+31
+0.8pp
Taiwanese
+33
+0.9pp
Italian
+17
+0.4pp
Korean
-58
-1.1pp
German
-5
0.0pp
Data table
Ancestry for Robertson (Qld). Ancestry - Ranked by size. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Brisbane (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Brisbane (C)% | Count | % | Brisbane (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Chinese | 1,707 | 35.9% | 7.7% | 1,949 | 39.2% | 7.2% | -242 | -3.3pp |
| English | 724 | 15.2% | 33.3% | 665 | 13.4% | 33.6% | +59 | +1.8pp |
| Australian | 523 | 11.0% | 27.9% | 560 | 11.3% | 28.1% | -37 | -0.3pp |
| Indian | 379 | 8.0% | 3.7% | 334 | 6.7% | 3.5% | +45 | +1.3pp |
| Irish | 269 | 5.7% | 12.3% | 251 | 5.0% | 13.4% | +18 | +0.7pp |
| Scottish | 211 | 4.4% | 10.2% | 180 | 3.6% | 10.3% | +31 | +0.8pp |
| Taiwanese | 169 | 3.6% | 0.4% | 136 | 2.7% | 0.3% | +33 | +0.9pp |
| Italian | 116 | 2.4% | 3.4% | 99 | 2.0% | 3.2% | +17 | +0.4pp |
| Korean | 105 | 2.2% | 1.1% | 163 | 3.3% | 1.1% | -58 | -1.1pp |
| German | 99 | 2.1% | 5.2% | 104 | 2.1% | 5.3% | -5 | 0.0pp |
Excludes ancestries with fewer than 10 responses (multi-response).