Employment
Method of travel to work
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Nashua, accounting for 46.6% (61 people). This share was lower than Byron (A) (47.9%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which decreased by 1,529 people and 20.3 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Nashua - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises method of travel to work for Nashua in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Byron (A) and change since 2016.
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Nashua, with comparison markers for Byron (A).
Train
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.2pp
0
0.0%
-0.2pp
Bus
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.9pp
0
0.0%
-0.9pp
Tram
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Ferry
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Car - as driver
2021 count
61
% of total
46.6%
Change from 2016
-20.3pp
61
46.6%
-20.3pp
Car - as passenger
2021 count
8
% of total
6.1%
Change from 2016
+1.3pp
8
6.1%
+1.3pp
Truck
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.9pp
0
0.0%
-0.9pp
Motorbike
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.4pp
0
0.0%
-0.4pp
Bicycle
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-0.3pp
0
0.0%
-0.3pp
Walked only
2021 count
9
% of total
6.9%
Change from 2016
+1.3pp
9
6.9%
+1.3pp
Other
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
-1.9pp
0
0.0%
-1.9pp
Worked at home
2021 count
32
% of total
24.4%
Change from 2016
+17.8pp
32
24.4%
+17.8pp
Did not go to work
2021 count
17
% of total
13.0%
Change from 2016
+2.2pp
17
13.0%
+2.2pp
Not stated
2021 count
4
% of total
3.1%
Change from 2016
+2.3pp
4
3.1%
+2.3pp
Chart view
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
-4
-0.2pp
Bus
-21
-0.9pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
0
0.0pp
Car - as driver
-1,529
-20.3pp
Car - as passenger
-106
+1.3pp
Truck
-21
-0.9pp
Motorbike
-10
-0.4pp
Bicycle
-6
-0.3pp
Walked only
-124
+1.3pp
Other
-44
-1.9pp
Worked at home
-126
+17.8pp
Did not go to work
-241
+2.2pp
Not stated
-15
+2.3pp
Data table
Method of travel to work for Nashua. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Byron (A).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Byron (A)% | Count | % | Byron (A)% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4 | 0.2% | 0.2% | -4 | -0.2pp |
| Bus | 0 | 0.0% | 0.3% | 21 | 0.9% | 0.7% | -21 | -0.9pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Car - as driver | 61 | 46.6% | 47.9% | 1,590 | 66.9% | 59.3% | -1,529 | -20.3pp |
| Car - as passenger | 8 | 6.1% | 2.5% | 114 | 4.8% | 3.5% | -106 | +1.3pp |
| Truck | 0 | 0.0% | 0.7% | 21 | 0.9% | 1.0% | -21 | -0.9pp |
| Motorbike | 0 | 0.0% | 0.5% | 10 | 0.4% | 0.7% | -10 | -0.4pp |
| Bicycle | 0 | 0.0% | 2.0% | 6 | 0.3% | 2.5% | -6 | -0.3pp |
| Walked only | 9 | 6.9% | 3.8% | 133 | 5.6% | 4.2% | -124 | +1.3pp |
| Other | 0 | 0.0% | 1.2% | 44 | 1.9% | 1.6% | -44 | -1.9pp |
| Worked at home | 32 | 24.4% | 26.5% | 158 | 6.6% | 13.4% | -126 | +17.8pp |
| Did not go to work | 17 | 13.0% | 13.8% | 258 | 10.8% | 11.0% | -241 | +2.2pp |
| Not stated | 4 | 3.1% | 0.9% | 19 | 0.8% | 1.7% | -15 | +2.3pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 131 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2,378 | 100.0% | 100.0% | -2,247 | 0.0pp |