Socio-Economic Indexes

SEIFA – disadvantage

About this topic

SEIFA (Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas) ranks Australian areas by relative advantage and disadvantage using Census data. The ABS constructs each index from a weighted combination of variables including household income, educational attainment, employment status, occupation skill level, and housing conditions.

Scores are relative, not absolute - they show how an area compares to all other areas in Australia, not whether residents are "poor" or "wealthy" in dollar terms. A score of 1000 represents the national average. Areas scoring below 1000 have relatively greater disadvantage; areas above have relatively less.

IRSD measures disadvantage only - it identifies areas where residents have fewer economic and social resources, but cannot distinguish between advantaged and average areas. IRSAD captures both ends of the spectrum, incorporating indicators of advantage such as high income and tertiary qualifications alongside disadvantage indicators.

SEIFA scores are widely used in grant applications, needs assessments, and service planning to identify areas requiring targeted investment or support.

Key insight

In 2021, Central Coast (M) (Tas.)'s Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) score was 958.1, placing it in the 35th percentile nationally. Within Central Coast (M) (Tas.), scores ranged from South Preston to Leith (part).

View

958.1

Central Coast (M) (Tas.) IRSD score

35th percentile nationally

1053.1

Highest local score

Leith (part)

877.6

Lowest local score

South Preston

Chart view

SEIFA – disadvantage across Tasmania LGAs

Compare the selected index across Tasmania LGAs with the current municipality highlighted.

Tasmania:966.2 · Percentile 45
Australia:1001.5 · Percentile 64
860.5953.11045.7
More disadvantagedLess disadvantaged

Hobart (C)

1045.7

Kingborough (M)

1038.5

Clarence (C)

1009.2

West Tamar (M)

1003.7

King Island (M)

992.8

Sorell (M)

990.7

Meander Valley (M)

975.7

Latrobe (M) (Tas.)

973.8

Huon Valley (M)

973.8

Northern Midlands (M)

966.2

Flinders (M) (Tas.)

962.7

Central Coast (M) (Tas.)

958.1

Kentish (M)

953.2

Southern Midlands (M)

951.3

Glamorgan/Spring Bay (M)

950.3

Circular Head (M)

942.7

Launceston (C)

939.5

Dorset (M)

931.5

Waratah/Wynyard (M)

929.1

Glenorchy (C)

927.4

Tasman (M)

923.1

Burnie (C)

920.3

Derwent Valley (M)

912.9

Break O'Day (M)

911.1

Central Highlands (M) (Tas.)

910.9

Devonport (C)

905.9

Brighton (M)

884.6

West Coast (M)

860.5

George Town (M)

860.5

Data table

SEIFA – disadvantage across Tasmania LGAs table

Download the underlying SEIFA scores and percentiles shown in the current view.

AreaScorePercentile
Hobart (C)1045.790
Kingborough (M)1038.586
Clarence (C)1009.273
West Tamar (M)1003.770
King Island (M)992.862
Sorell (M)990.760
Meander Valley (M)975.748
Latrobe (M) (Tas.)973.847
Huon Valley (M)973.847
Northern Midlands (M)966.242
Flinders (M) (Tas.)962.739
Central Coast (M) (Tas.)958.135
Kentish (M)953.232
Southern Midlands (M)951.331
Glamorgan/Spring Bay (M)950.331
Circular Head (M)942.726
Launceston (C)939.524
Dorset (M)931.521
Waratah/Wynyard (M)929.120
Glenorchy (C)927.420
Tasman (M)923.118
Burnie (C)920.317
Derwent Valley (M)912.916
Break O'Day (M)911.116
Central Highlands (M) (Tas.)910.915
Devonport (C)905.914
Brighton (M)884.610
West Coast (M)860.59
George Town (M)860.59
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), 2021. Compiled by Geografia.