Housing
Dwellings
Dwelling type shows the structure of dwellings, such as separate houses, medium density housing, and higher density housing. It is a core measure of built form and residential density within an area.
About this topic
Dwelling type shows the structure of dwellings, such as separate houses, medium density housing, and higher density housing. It is a core measure of built form and residential density within an area.
This topic helps explain the housing role of an area and the kinds of households it may attract. It is best read with household size, household type, tenure, and age structure, because built form and population characteristics are closely related.
Interpretation notes
- Dwelling structure describes the physical form of dwellings counted on Census night rather than tenure, housing condition, or household makeup.
- It is strongest when read alongside household size and tenure, because structure alone does not show who lives there.
Key insight
In 2021, separate houses was the most common dwelling type among dwellings in Cecil Park (part), accounting for 97.5% (230 dwellings). This share was higher than Fairfield (C) (71.6%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in separate houses, which increased by 10 dwellings, while its share fell by 1.6 percentage points.
Section overview
Dwelling structure
Cecil Park (part) - Dwellings (Enumerated)
This table summarises dwellings for Cecil Park (part) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Fairfield (C) and change since 2016.
Dwelling structure snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Cecil Park (part), with comparison markers for Fairfield (C).
Separate house
Medium density
High density
Caravans, cabin, houseboat
Other
Not stated
Chart view
Dwelling structure change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Separate house
+10
-1.6pp
Medium density
+5
+2.1pp
High density
0
0.0pp
Caravans, cabin, houseboat
0
0.0pp
Other
0
0.0pp
Not stated
-3
-1.4pp
Data table
Dwellings for Cecil Park (part). Dwelling structure. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Fairfield (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Fairfield (C)% | Count | % | Fairfield (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Separate house | 230 | 97.5% | 71.6% | 220 | 99.1% | 71.6% | +10 | -1.6pp |
| Medium density | 5 | 2.1% | 18.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 18.1% | +5 | +2.1pp |
| High density | 0 | 0.0% | 9.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 8.9% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Caravans, cabin, houseboat | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Other | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Not stated | 0 | 0.0% | 0.3% | 3 | 1.4% | 0.5% | -3 | -1.4pp |
| Total Occupied Private Dwellings | 236 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 222 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +14 | 0.0pp |