Employment
Travel To Work
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in George Town (M), accounting for 69.5% (1,731 people). This share was higher than Regional Tas. (67.6%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 144 people, while its share fell by 3.2 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
George Town (M) - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises travel to work for George Town (M) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Regional Tas. and change since 2016.
Chart view
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for George Town (M), with comparison markers for Regional Tas..
Train
Bus
Tram
Ferry
Taxi/ride-share
Car - as driver
Car - as passenger
Truck
Motorbike
Bicycle
Walked only
Other
Worked at home
Did not go to work
Not stated
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
0
0.0pp
Bus
-13
-0.7pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
-3
-0.1pp
Car - as driver
+144
-3.2pp
Car - as passenger
+34
+0.9pp
Truck
-1
-0.1pp
Motorbike
+3
+0.1pp
Bicycle
+5
+0.1pp
Walked only
+9
+0.1pp
Other
-1
-0.2pp
Worked at home
+102
+3.6pp
Did not go to work
+48
+0.5pp
Not stated
-19
-1.0pp
Data table
Travel To Work for George Town (M). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Regional Tas..
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Regional Tas.% | Count | % | Regional Tas.% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Bus | 13 | 0.5% | 1.1% | 26 | 1.2% | 1.0% | -13 | -0.7pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 3 | 0.1% | 0.2% | -3 | -0.1pp |
| Car - as driver | 1,731 | 69.5% | 67.6% | 1,587 | 72.7% | 67.8% | +144 | -3.2pp |
| Car - as passenger | 114 | 4.6% | 4.9% | 80 | 3.7% | 5.2% | +34 | +0.9pp |
| Truck | 24 | 1.0% | 0.8% | 25 | 1.1% | 0.9% | -1 | -0.1pp |
| Motorbike | 3 | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.5% | +3 | +0.1pp |
| Bicycle | 16 | 0.6% | 0.3% | 11 | 0.5% | 0.4% | +5 | +0.1pp |
| Walked only | 71 | 2.9% | 3.8% | 62 | 2.8% | 4.2% | +9 | +0.1pp |
| Other | 26 | 1.0% | 1.1% | 27 | 1.2% | 1.4% | -1 | -0.2pp |
| Worked at home | 178 | 7.1% | 7.8% | 76 | 3.5% | 5.3% | +102 | +3.6pp |
| Did not go to work | 294 | 11.8% | 11.1% | 246 | 11.3% | 11.8% | +48 | +0.5pp |
| Not stated | 21 | 0.8% | 0.8% | 40 | 1.8% | 1.2% | -19 | -1.0pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 2,491 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2,183 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +308 | 0.0pp |