Income
Individual income quartiles
About this topic
Individual income quartiles group people aged 15 years and over into four evenly sized income ranges so the distribution of personal income can be compared objectively across areas and over time. The quartile method focuses on relative position in the income distribution rather than raw dollar brackets.
This topic is useful because direct income amounts are affected by inflation and wider economic change. Quartiles provide a clearer way to compare whether an area is becoming relatively lower, middle, or higher income over time.
Interpretation notes
- This is a derived distribution of personal income for people aged 15 years and over, with each quartile representing a quarter of the income distribution.
- Quartiles show relative position rather than fixed dollar brackets, which makes them more robust for comparisons over time.
Key insight
In 2021, the lowest income quartile held the largest share among residents aged 15 and over in Mount Larcom, accounting for 30%.
Section overview
Individual income quartiles
Mount Larcom - Persons aged 15+ (Usual residence)
This table summarises individual income quartiles for Mount Larcom in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Gladstone (R) and change since 2016.
Chart view
Individual income quartiles snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Mount Larcom, with comparison markers for Gladstone (R).
Lowest group
2021 count
75
% of total
30.0%
Change from 2016
+12.4pp
75
30.0%
+12.4pp
Medium lowest
2021 count
68
% of total
27.2%
Change from 2016
-3.7pp
68
27.2%
-3.7pp
Medium highest
2021 count
57
% of total
22.8%
Change from 2016
-12.5pp
57
22.8%
-12.5pp
Highest group
2021 count
50
% of total
20.0%
Change from 2016
+3.8pp
50
20.0%
+3.8pp
Individual income quartiles change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Lowest group
+63
+12.4pp
Medium lowest
+47
-3.7pp
Medium highest
+33
-12.5pp
Highest group
+39
+3.8pp
Data table
Individual income quartiles for Mount Larcom. Individual income quartiles. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Gladstone (R).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Gladstone (R)% | Count | % | Gladstone (R)% | Count | pp | |
| Lowest group | 75 | 30.0% | 26.3% | 12 | 17.6% | 26.2% | +63 | +12.4pp |
| Medium lowest | 68 | 27.2% | 25.8% | 21 | 30.9% | 22.3% | +47 | -3.7pp |
| Medium highest | 57 | 22.8% | 21.0% | 24 | 35.3% | 19.5% | +33 | -12.5pp |
| Highest group | 50 | 20.0% | 27.0% | 11 | 16.2% | 32.1% | +39 | +3.8pp |
| Total persons aged 15+ | 250 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 68 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +182 | 0.0pp |