Socio-Economic Indexes
SEIFA – disadvantage
About this topic
SEIFA (Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas) ranks Australian areas by relative advantage and disadvantage using Census data. The ABS constructs each index from a weighted combination of variables including household income, educational attainment, employment status, occupation skill level, and housing conditions.
Scores are relative, not absolute - they show how an area compares to all other areas in Australia, not whether residents are "poor" or "wealthy" in dollar terms. A score of 1000 represents the national average. Areas scoring below 1000 have relatively greater disadvantage; areas above have relatively less.
IRSD measures disadvantage only - it identifies areas where residents have fewer economic and social resources, but cannot distinguish between advantaged and average areas. IRSAD captures both ends of the spectrum, incorporating indicators of advantage such as high income and tertiary qualifications alongside disadvantage indicators.
SEIFA scores are widely used in grant applications, needs assessments, and service planning to identify areas requiring targeted investment or support.
Related topics
Key insight
In 2021, Katherine (T)'s Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) score was 961.1, placing it in the 37th percentile nationally. Within Katherine (T), scores ranged from Binjari to Tindal.
View
961.1
Katherine (T) IRSD score
37th percentile nationally
1145.9
Highest local score
Tindal
360.6
Lowest local score
Binjari
Chart view
SEIFA – disadvantage across Northern Territory LGAs
Compare the selected index across Northern Territory LGAs with the current municipality highlighted.
Darwin Waterfront Precinct
1116.7
Unincorporated NT
1043.7
Litchfield (M)
1030.2
Darwin (C)
1026.9
Palmerston (C)
1009.3
Alice Springs (T)
994
Wagait (S)
984.7
Katherine (T)
961.1
Coomalie (S)
909
Barkly (R)
669.6
Victoria Daly (R)
589.9
MacDonnell (R)
565.7
Tiwi Islands (R)
563.9
Roper Gulf (R)
534
West Arnhem (R)
530.4
Central Desert (R)
523.5
East Arnhem (R)
485.6
Belyuen (S)
471.2
West Daly (R)
439.5
Data table
SEIFA – disadvantage across Northern Territory LGAs table
Download the underlying SEIFA scores and percentiles shown in the current view.
| Area | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Darwin Waterfront Precinct | 1116.7 | 100 |
| Unincorporated NT | 1043.7 | 88 |
| Litchfield (M) | 1030.2 | 84 |
| Darwin (C) | 1026.9 | 81 |
| Palmerston (C) | 1009.3 | 73 |
| Alice Springs (T) | 994 | 63 |
| Wagait (S) | 984.7 | 54 |
| Katherine (T) | 961.1 | 37 |
| Coomalie (S) | 909 | 15 |
| Barkly (R) | 669.6 | 6 |
| Victoria Daly (R) | 589.9 | 5 |
| MacDonnell (R) | 565.7 | 4 |
| Tiwi Islands (R) | 563.9 | 4 |
| Roper Gulf (R) | 534 | 3 |
| West Arnhem (R) | 530.4 | 3 |
| Central Desert (R) | 523.5 | 3 |
| East Arnhem (R) | 485.6 | 1 |
| Belyuen (S) | 471.2 | 1 |
| West Daly (R) | 439.5 | 1 |
Chart view
Variation within Katherine (T)
See the spread of scores across smaller areas within the municipality.
Tindal
1145.9
Percentile 100
Uralla (NT)
1056.4
Percentile 77
Lansdowne (NT) (part)
1050.4
Percentile 73
Claravale (part)
1023.4
Percentile 56
Edith (NT) (part)
1007.5
Percentile 46
Florina
1006.6
Percentile 45
Manbulloo
1006.6
Percentile 45
Venn
1006.6
Percentile 45
Katherine
985.6
Percentile 34
Cossack (NT)
960.5
Percentile 23
Katherine East
957
Percentile 22
Katherine South
932.3
Percentile 15
Emungalan
685.9
Percentile 2
Binjari
360.6
Percentile 1
Data table
Variation within Katherine (T) table
Download the underlying SEIFA scores and percentiles shown in the current view.
| Area | Score | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Tindal | 1145.9 | 100 |
| Uralla (NT) | 1056.4 | 77 |
| Lansdowne (NT) (part) | 1050.4 | 73 |
| Claravale (part) | 1023.4 | 56 |
| Edith (NT) (part) | 1007.5 | 46 |
| Florina | 1006.6 | 45 |
| Manbulloo | 1006.6 | 45 |
| Venn | 1006.6 | 45 |
| Katherine | 985.6 | 34 |
| Cossack (NT) | 960.5 | 23 |
| Katherine East | 957 | 22 |
| Katherine South | 932.3 | 15 |
| Emungalan | 685.9 | 2 |
| Binjari | 360.6 | 1 |