Housing
Tenure
About this topic
Housing tenure shows whether households own their dwelling outright, are purchasing it, rent privately, rent from a social landlord, or occupy it under another arrangement. It describes how households hold or access housing, not the type of dwelling itself.
This topic is useful for analysing housing markets, affordability, stability, and the mix of owners and renters. It works best alongside dwelling type, household composition, and housing cost topics such as mortgage repayments and rent.
Interpretation notes
- Tenure type describes how the dwelling is occupied, including ownership, mortgage, rental, or other arrangements.
- It applies to occupied private dwellings and should not be confused with dwelling structure or housing cost measures.
Key insight
In 2021, 11.5% of households in Mount Isa City were purchasing or had fully paid off their home, while 63.5% were renting. The mortgage share was lower than Mount Isa (C) (25.7%).
Section overview
Housing tenure
Mount Isa City - Households (Enumerated)
This table summarises tenure for Mount Isa City in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Mount Isa (C) and change since 2016.
Housing tenure snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Mount Isa City, with comparison markers for Mount Isa (C).
Fully owned
Mortgage
Renting - Total
Renting - Social housing
Renting - Private
Renting - Not stated
Other tenure type
Not stated
Chart view
Housing tenure change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Fully owned
-1
0.0pp
Mortgage
-6
-10.5pp
Renting - Total
-4
+2.3pp
Renting - Social housing
+2
+3.4pp
Renting - Private
-3
+4.4pp
Renting - Not stated
-3
-5.2pp
Other tenure type
+4
+7.4pp
Not stated
-2
-2.4pp
Data table
Tenure for Mount Isa City. Housing tenure. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Mount Isa (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Mount Isa (C)% | Count | % | Mount Isa (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Fully owned | 6 | 11.5% | 17.8% | 7 | 11.5% | 15.5% | -1 | 0.0pp |
| Mortgage | 0 | 0.0% | 25.7% | 6 | 10.5% | 27.9% | -6 | -10.5pp |
| Renting - Total | 33 | 63.5% | 41.4% | 37 | 61.2% | 40.0% | -4 | +2.3pp |
| Renting - Social housing | 3 | 5.8% | 8.0% | 1 | 2.4% | 7.6% | +2 | +3.4pp |
| Renting - Private | 30 | 57.7% | 33.1% | 33 | 53.3% | 31.4% | -3 | +4.4pp |
| Renting - Not stated | 0 | 0.0% | 0.4% | 3 | 5.2% | 0.9% | -3 | -5.2pp |
| Other tenure type | 4 | 7.7% | 4.3% | 0 | 0.3% | 0.7% | +4 | +7.4pp |
| Not stated | 4 | 7.7% | 10.9% | 6 | 10.1% | 16.0% | -2 | -2.4pp |
| Total households | 52 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 61 | 100.0% | 100.0% | -9 | 0.0pp |
2016 values for this suburb are estimated onto 2021 suburb boundaries using an ABS concordance. Because the boundary change is material, 2016 comparisons should be read as approximate.