Housing
Tenure
Housing tenure shows whether households own their dwelling outright, are purchasing it, rent privately, rent from a social landlord, or occupy it under another arrangement. It describes how households hold or access housing, not the type of dwelling itself.
About this topic
Housing tenure shows whether households own their dwelling outright, are purchasing it, rent privately, rent from a social landlord, or occupy it under another arrangement. It describes how households hold or access housing, not the type of dwelling itself.
This topic is useful for analysing housing markets, affordability, stability, and the mix of owners and renters. It works best alongside dwelling type, household composition, and housing cost topics such as mortgage repayments and rent.
Interpretation notes
- Tenure type describes how the dwelling is occupied, including ownership, mortgage, rental, or other arrangements.
- It applies to occupied private dwellings and should not be confused with dwelling structure or housing cost measures.
Key insight
In 2021, 63.4% of households in Como (Qld) were purchasing or had fully paid off their home, while 16.7% were renting. The mortgage share was lower than Noosa (S) (29.1%).
Section overview
Housing tenure
Como (Qld) - Households (Enumerated)
This table summarises tenure for Como (Qld) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Noosa (S) and change since 2016.
Chart view
Housing tenure snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Como (Qld), with comparison markers for Noosa (S).
Fully owned
Mortgage
Renting - Total
Renting - Social housing
Renting - Private
Renting - Not stated
Other tenure type
Not stated
Housing tenure change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Fully owned
+1
+7.3pp
Mortgage
+2
+7.6pp
Renting - Total
+1
+4.6pp
Renting - Social housing
0
0.0pp
Renting - Private
0
+0.9pp
Renting - Not stated
0
0.0pp
Other tenure type
+3
+10.0pp
Not stated
-14
-42.4pp
Data table
Tenure for Como (Qld). Housing tenure. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Noosa (S).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Noosa (S)% | Count | % | Noosa (S)% | Count | pp | |
| Fully owned | 14 | 46.7% | 42.3% | 13 | 39.4% | 37.8% | +1 | +7.3pp |
| Mortgage | 5 | 16.7% | 29.1% | 3 | 9.1% | 29.0% | +2 | +7.6pp |
| Renting - Total | 5 | 16.7% | 20.6% | 4 | 12.1% | 24.1% | +1 | +4.6pp |
| Renting - Social housing | 0 | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Renting - Private | 3 | 10.0% | 19.0% | 3 | 9.1% | 21.9% | 0 | +0.9pp |
| Renting - Not stated | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Other tenure type | 3 | 10.0% | 2.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.6% | +3 | +10.0pp |
| Not stated | 0 | 0.0% | 5.2% | 14 | 42.4% | 7.4% | -14 | -42.4pp |
| Total households | 30 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 33 | 100.0% | 100.0% | -3 | 0.0pp |