Employment
Travel To Work
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Northern Midlands (M), accounting for 68.6% (4,319 people). This share was higher than Regional Tas. (67.6%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 567 people and 0.3 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Northern Midlands (M) - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises travel to work for Northern Midlands (M) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Regional Tas. and change since 2016.
Chart view
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Northern Midlands (M), with comparison markers for Regional Tas..
Train
Bus
Tram
Ferry
Taxi/ride-share
Car - as driver
Car - as passenger
Truck
Motorbike
Bicycle
Walked only
Other
Worked at home
Did not go to work
Not stated
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
-3
-0.1pp
Bus
+32
+0.4pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
-3
-0.1pp
Car - as driver
+567
+0.3pp
Car - as passenger
+26
-0.1pp
Truck
+14
0.0pp
Motorbike
-6
-0.2pp
Bicycle
0
0.0pp
Walked only
-10
-0.8pp
Other
-1
-0.1pp
Worked at home
+163
+1.7pp
Did not go to work
+24
-1.1pp
Not stated
-4
-0.2pp
Data table
Travel To Work for Northern Midlands (M). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Regional Tas..
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Regional Tas.% | Count | % | Regional Tas.% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3 | 0.1% | 0.1% | -3 | -0.1pp |
| Bus | 58 | 0.9% | 1.1% | 26 | 0.5% | 1.0% | +32 | +0.4pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 3 | 0.1% | 0.2% | -3 | -0.1pp |
| Car - as driver | 4,319 | 68.6% | 67.6% | 3,752 | 68.3% | 67.8% | +567 | +0.3pp |
| Car - as passenger | 256 | 4.1% | 4.9% | 230 | 4.2% | 5.2% | +26 | -0.1pp |
| Truck | 72 | 1.1% | 0.8% | 58 | 1.1% | 0.9% | +14 | 0.0pp |
| Motorbike | 20 | 0.3% | 0.4% | 26 | 0.5% | 0.5% | -6 | -0.2pp |
| Bicycle | 13 | 0.2% | 0.3% | 13 | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Walked only | 263 | 4.2% | 3.8% | 273 | 5.0% | 4.2% | -10 | -0.8pp |
| Other | 60 | 1.0% | 1.1% | 61 | 1.1% | 1.4% | -1 | -0.1pp |
| Worked at home | 543 | 8.6% | 7.8% | 380 | 6.9% | 5.3% | +163 | +1.7pp |
| Did not go to work | 626 | 9.9% | 11.1% | 602 | 11.0% | 11.8% | +24 | -1.1pp |
| Not stated | 63 | 1.0% | 0.8% | 67 | 1.2% | 1.2% | -4 | -0.2pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 6,293 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 5,494 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +799 | 0.0pp |