Employment
Method of travel to work
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Coromandel Valley (part), accounting for 62.1% (1,470 people). This share was lower than Onkaparinga (C) (66.8%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in working from home, which increased by 214 people and 8.7 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Coromandel Valley (part) - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises method of travel to work for Coromandel Valley (part) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Onkaparinga (C) and change since 2016.
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Coromandel Valley (part), with comparison markers for Onkaparinga (C).
Train
2021 count
83
% of total
3.5%
Change from 2016
-2.8pp
83
3.5%
-2.8pp
Bus
2021 count
19
% of total
0.8%
Change from 2016
-0.4pp
19
0.8%
-0.4pp
Tram
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Ferry
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Car - as driver
2021 count
1,470
% of total
62.1%
Change from 2016
-7.4pp
1,470
62.1%
-7.4pp
Car - as passenger
2021 count
80
% of total
3.4%
Change from 2016
-0.7pp
80
3.4%
-0.7pp
Truck
2021 count
16
% of total
0.7%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
16
0.7%
0.0pp
Motorbike
2021 count
17
% of total
0.7%
Change from 2016
+0.3pp
17
0.7%
+0.3pp
Bicycle
2021 count
9
% of total
0.4%
Change from 2016
+0.1pp
9
0.4%
+0.1pp
Walked only
2021 count
23
% of total
1.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
23
1.0%
0.0pp
Other
2021 count
41
% of total
1.7%
Change from 2016
+0.6pp
41
1.7%
+0.6pp
Worked at home
2021 count
299
% of total
12.6%
Change from 2016
+8.7pp
299
12.6%
+8.7pp
Did not go to work
2021 count
304
% of total
12.8%
Change from 2016
+1.7pp
304
12.8%
+1.7pp
Not stated
2021 count
5
% of total
0.2%
Change from 2016
-0.2pp
5
0.2%
-0.2pp
Chart view
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
-54
-2.8pp
Bus
-7
-0.4pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
0
0.0pp
Car - as driver
-49
-7.4pp
Car - as passenger
-9
-0.7pp
Truck
0
0.0pp
Motorbike
+9
+0.3pp
Bicycle
+2
+0.1pp
Walked only
+1
0.0pp
Other
+16
+0.6pp
Worked at home
+214
+8.7pp
Did not go to work
+62
+1.7pp
Not stated
-4
-0.2pp
Data table
Method of travel to work for Coromandel Valley (part). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Onkaparinga (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Onkaparinga (C)% | Count | % | Onkaparinga (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 83 | 3.5% | 2.3% | 137 | 6.3% | 2.8% | -54 | -2.8pp |
| Bus | 19 | 0.8% | 1.8% | 26 | 1.2% | 3.0% | -7 | -0.4pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Car - as driver | 1,470 | 62.1% | 66.8% | 1,519 | 69.5% | 69.7% | -49 | -7.4pp |
| Car - as passenger | 80 | 3.4% | 3.7% | 89 | 4.1% | 4.2% | -9 | -0.7pp |
| Truck | 16 | 0.7% | 0.6% | 16 | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Motorbike | 17 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 8 | 0.4% | 0.4% | +9 | +0.3pp |
| Bicycle | 9 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 7 | 0.3% | 0.3% | +2 | +0.1pp |
| Walked only | 23 | 1.0% | 1.1% | 22 | 1.0% | 1.2% | +1 | 0.0pp |
| Other | 41 | 1.7% | 1.3% | 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | +16 | +0.6pp |
| Worked at home | 299 | 12.6% | 9.0% | 85 | 3.9% | 3.5% | +214 | +8.7pp |
| Did not go to work | 304 | 12.8% | 12.3% | 242 | 11.1% | 11.9% | +62 | +1.7pp |
| Not stated | 5 | 0.2% | 0.4% | 9 | 0.4% | 0.8% | -4 | -0.2pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 2,366 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2,185 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +181 | 0.0pp |