Employment
Method of travel to work
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Regentville, accounting for 46.8% (196 people). This share was lower than Penrith (C) (47.9%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 190 people and 6.8 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Regentville - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises method of travel to work for Regentville in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Penrith (C) and change since 2016.
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Regentville, with comparison markers for Penrith (C).
Train
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Bus
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Tram
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Ferry
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Car - as driver
2021 count
196
% of total
46.8%
Change from 2016
+6.8pp
196
46.8%
+6.8pp
Car - as passenger
2021 count
17
% of total
4.1%
Change from 2016
+4.1pp
17
4.1%
+4.1pp
Truck
2021 count
12
% of total
2.9%
Change from 2016
+2.9pp
12
2.9%
+2.9pp
Motorbike
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Bicycle
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Walked only
2021 count
3
% of total
0.7%
Change from 2016
+0.7pp
3
0.7%
+0.7pp
Other
2021 count
0
% of total
0.0%
Change from 2016
0.0pp
0
0.0%
0.0pp
Worked at home
2021 count
126
% of total
30.1%
Change from 2016
-9.9pp
126
30.1%
-9.9pp
Did not go to work
2021 count
61
% of total
14.6%
Change from 2016
-5.4pp
61
14.6%
-5.4pp
Not stated
2021 count
4
% of total
1.0%
Change from 2016
+1.0pp
4
1.0%
+1.0pp
Chart view
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
0
0.0pp
Bus
0
0.0pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
0
0.0pp
Car - as driver
+190
+6.8pp
Car - as passenger
+17
+4.1pp
Truck
+12
+2.9pp
Motorbike
0
0.0pp
Bicycle
0
0.0pp
Walked only
+3
+0.7pp
Other
0
0.0pp
Worked at home
+120
-9.9pp
Did not go to work
+58
-5.4pp
Not stated
+4
+1.0pp
Data table
Method of travel to work for Regentville. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Penrith (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Penrith (C)% | Count | % | Penrith (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 0 | 0.0% | 2.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 10.3% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Bus | 0 | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Car - as driver | 196 | 46.8% | 47.9% | 6 | 40.0% | 66.5% | +190 | +6.8pp |
| Car - as passenger | 17 | 4.1% | 3.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 4.9% | +17 | +4.1pp |
| Truck | 12 | 2.9% | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.8% | +12 | +2.9pp |
| Motorbike | 0 | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Bicycle | 0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Walked only | 3 | 0.7% | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.4% | +3 | +0.7pp |
| Other | 0 | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Worked at home | 126 | 30.1% | 26.3% | 6 | 40.0% | 3.0% | +120 | -9.9pp |
| Did not go to work | 61 | 14.6% | 15.0% | 3 | 20.0% | 8.5% | +58 | -5.4pp |
| Not stated | 4 | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.8% | +4 | +1.0pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 419 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 15 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +404 | 0.0pp |