Population
Assistance
About this topic
Need for assistance measures people who report needing help with self-care, body movement, or communication because of a disability, a long-term health condition, or older age. It is a high-needs indicator rather than a general measure of disability.
This topic is useful for planning accessible facilities, care services, respite, and support for carers. The measure is based on self-report in the Census, so it should be interpreted with care and read alongside unpaid care and other disability-related indicators.
Interpretation notes
- The measure is self-reported and records need for help with core activities, so it is not a complete measure of disability prevalence.
- It applies to all persons and is strongest as an indicator of higher support need when read with unpaid care and ageing data.
Key insight
In 2021, 55-64 year olds was the most common age group among residents who needed assistance with core activities in Amity, accounting for 8.1% (7 people). This share was higher than Redland (C) (5.5%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in 65-74 year olds, which decreased by 5 people and 5.4 percentage points.
Section overview
Need for assistance with core activities by age
Amity - Persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises assistance for Amity in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Redland (C) and change since 2016.
Need for assistance with core activities by age snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Amity, with comparison markers for Redland (C).
Bars reflect 2021 counts; benchmark rates remain in the metrics.
0-4
5-14
15-19
20-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
Chart view
Need for assistance with core activities by age change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
0-4
0
0.0pp
5-14
-3
-11.1pp
15-19
0
0.0pp
20-24
0
0.0pp
25-34
0
0.0pp
35-44
-5
-14.7pp
45-54
-1
-4.2pp
55-64
0
-2.3pp
65-74
-5
-5.4pp
75-84
-1
-8.5pp
85+
-5
-45.5pp
Data table
Assistance for Amity. Need for assistance with core activities by age. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Redland (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Redland (C)% | Count | % | Redland (C)% | Count | pp | |
| 0-4 | 0 | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| 5-14 | 0 | 0.0% | 6.2% | 3 | 11.1% | 4.2% | -3 | -11.1pp |
| 15-19 | 0 | 0.0% | 4.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 2.9% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| 20-24 | 0 | 0.0% | 3.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 2.6% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| 25-34 | 0 | 0.0% | 2.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 2.5% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| 35-44 | 0 | 0.0% | 2.5% | 5 | 14.7% | 2.5% | -5 | -14.7pp |
| 45-54 | 3 | 5.3% | 3.3% | 4 | 9.5% | 3.3% | -1 | -4.2pp |
| 55-64 | 7 | 8.1% | 5.5% | 7 | 10.4% | 5.1% | 0 | -2.3pp |
| 65-74 | 3 | 2.8% | 9.0% | 8 | 8.2% | 8.7% | -5 | -5.4pp |
| 75-84 | 7 | 13.7% | 19.7% | 8 | 22.2% | 18.5% | -1 | -8.5pp |
| 85+ | 0 | 0.0% | 49.2% | 5 | 45.5% | 42.1% | -5 | -45.5pp |
| Total | 24 | 5.3% | 6.7% | 38 | 9.8% | 5.5% | -14 | -4.5pp |