Employment

Method of travel to work

About this topic

Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.

This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.

Interpretation notes

  • Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
  • It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
  • The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.

Key insight

In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Ingle Farm, accounting for 68.2% (2,808 people). This share was lower than Salisbury (C) (70.7%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 2,805 people and 55.7 percentage points.

Section overview

Method of travel to work

Ingle Farm - Employed persons (Usual residence)

This table summarises method of travel to work for Ingle Farm in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Salisbury (C) and change since 2016.

Method of travel to work snapshot

2021 distribution by category for Ingle Farm, with comparison markers for Salisbury (C).

Ingle Farm
Salisbury (C)

Train

2021 count

18

% of total

0.4%

Change from 2016

+0.4pp

Bus

2021 count

296

% of total

7.2%

Change from 2016

+7.2pp

Tram

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Ferry

2021 count

0

% of total

0.0%

Change from 2016

0.0pp

Taxi/ride-share

2021 count

16

% of total

0.4%

Change from 2016

+0.4pp

Car - as driver

2021 count

2,808

% of total

68.2%

Change from 2016

+55.7pp

Car - as passenger

2021 count

188

% of total

4.6%

Change from 2016

+4.6pp

Truck

2021 count

21

% of total

0.5%

Change from 2016

+0.5pp

Motorbike

2021 count

23

% of total

0.6%

Change from 2016

+0.6pp

Bicycle

2021 count

11

% of total

0.3%

Change from 2016

+0.3pp

Walked only

2021 count

35

% of total

0.8%

Change from 2016

-40.9pp

Other

2021 count

58

% of total

1.4%

Change from 2016

-27.8pp

Worked at home

2021 count

233

% of total

5.7%

Change from 2016

-11.0pp

Did not go to work

2021 count

400

% of total

9.7%

Change from 2016

+9.7pp

Not stated

2021 count

12

% of total

0.3%

Change from 2016

+0.3pp

Data table

Method of travel to work for Ingle Farm. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Salisbury (C).

Method of travel to work for Ingle Farm. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Salisbury (C).
Method of travel to work for Ingle Farm. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Salisbury (C).
Category20212016Change
Count%Salisbury (C)%Count%Salisbury (C)%Countpp
Train180.4%0.3%00.0%3.3%+18+0.4pp
Bus2967.2%4.5%00.0%4.0%+296+7.2pp
Tram00.0%0.0%00.0%0.0%00.0pp
Ferry00.0%0.0%00.0%0.0%00.0pp
Taxi/ride-share160.4%0.3%00.0%0.2%+16+0.4pp
Car - as driver2,80868.2%70.7%312.5%71.3%+2,805+55.7pp
Car - as passenger1884.6%5.0%00.0%5.0%+188+4.6pp
Truck210.5%0.5%00.0%0.7%+21+0.5pp
Motorbike230.6%0.4%00.0%0.4%+23+0.6pp
Bicycle110.3%0.3%00.0%0.4%+11+0.3pp
Walked only350.8%1.0%1041.7%1.2%+25-40.9pp
Other581.4%1.3%729.2%1.3%+51-27.8pp
Worked at home2335.7%5.7%416.7%2.0%+229-11.0pp
Did not go to work4009.7%9.3%00.0%9.4%+400+9.7pp
Not stated120.3%0.5%00.0%0.9%+12+0.3pp
Total employed persons aged 15+4,119100.0%100.0%24100.0%100.0%+4,0950.0pp