Housing
Housing rental quartiles
Housing rental quartiles group renting households into four evenly sized rent bands so rental costs can be compared across places and across Census years. They show the relative rent profile of the renting population rather than fixed weekly rent brackets.
About this topic
Housing rental quartiles group renting households into four evenly sized rent bands so rental costs can be compared across places and across Census years. They show the relative rent profile of the renting population rather than fixed weekly rent brackets.
This topic is useful for comparing change over time because direct rent amounts are affected by inflation and broader market shifts. It is best read with household income and tenure when assessing rental affordability and housing stress.
Interpretation notes
- This is a derived rent distribution for renting households, so quartiles show relative rent position rather than fixed weekly rent bands.
- Quartiles are more useful than raw rent ranges for comparing rental profiles across areas or years.
Key insight
In 2021, the highest rent quartile held the largest share among households renting their home in Hyde Park (SA), accounting for 56.5%.
Section overview
Housing rental quartiles
Hyde Park (SA) - Households (Enumerated)
This table summarises housing rental quartiles for Hyde Park (SA) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Unley (C) and change since 2016.
This area boundary has changed from 2016 to 2021. As a result, 2016 values are mapped onto 2021 suburb boundaries using ABS concordance.
Housing rental quartiles snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Hyde Park (SA), with comparison markers for Unley (C).
Lowest group
Medium lowest
Medium highest
Highest group
Chart view
Housing rental quartiles change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Lowest group
-
-
Medium lowest
-
-
Medium highest
-
-
Highest group
-
-
Data table
Housing rental quartiles for Hyde Park (SA). Housing rental quartiles. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Unley (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Unley (C)% | Count | % | Unley (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Lowest group | 10 | 5.2% | 13.0% | 15 | 8.7% | 13.9% | - | - |
| Medium lowest | 33 | 17.3% | 19.8% | 27 | 15.6% | 17.7% | - | - |
| Medium highest | 40 | 20.9% | 21.2% | 35 | 20.2% | 24.8% | - | - |
| Highest group | 108 | 56.5% | 46.0% | 96 | 55.5% | 43.7% | - | - |
| Total households with stated rent | 191 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 173 | 100.0% | 100.0% | - | - |