Income
Individual income quartiles
About this topic
Individual income quartiles group people aged 15 years and over into four evenly sized income ranges so the distribution of personal income can be compared objectively across areas and over time. The quartile method focuses on relative position in the income distribution rather than raw dollar brackets.
This topic is useful because direct income amounts are affected by inflation and wider economic change. Quartiles provide a clearer way to compare whether an area is becoming relatively lower, middle, or higher income over time.
Interpretation notes
- This is a derived distribution of personal income for people aged 15 years and over, with each quartile representing a quarter of the income distribution.
- Quartiles show relative position rather than fixed dollar brackets, which makes them more robust for comparisons over time.
Key insight
In 2021, the medium-low income quartile held the largest share among residents aged 15 and over in Cumborah, accounting for 46.8%.
Section overview
Individual income quartiles
Cumborah - Persons aged 15+ (Usual residence)
This table summarises individual income quartiles for Cumborah in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Walgett (A) and change since 2016.
Individual income quartiles snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Cumborah, with comparison markers for Walgett (A).
Lowest group
2021 count
48
% of total
30.4%
Change from 2016
-2.9pp
48
30.4%
-2.9pp
Medium lowest
2021 count
74
% of total
46.8%
Change from 2016
-2.4pp
74
46.8%
-2.4pp
Medium highest
2021 count
20
% of total
12.7%
Change from 2016
+5.1pp
20
12.7%
+5.1pp
Highest group
2021 count
16
% of total
10.1%
Change from 2016
+0.3pp
16
10.1%
+0.3pp
Chart view
Individual income quartiles change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Lowest group
+4
-2.9pp
Medium lowest
+9
-2.4pp
Medium highest
+10
+5.1pp
Highest group
+3
+0.3pp
Data table
Individual income quartiles for Cumborah. Individual income quartiles. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Walgett (A).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Walgett (A)% | Count | % | Walgett (A)% | Count | pp | |
| Lowest group | 48 | 30.4% | 28.6% | 44 | 33.3% | 27.5% | +4 | -2.9pp |
| Medium lowest | 74 | 46.8% | 34.3% | 65 | 49.2% | 36.5% | +9 | -2.4pp |
| Medium highest | 20 | 12.7% | 21.3% | 10 | 7.6% | 21.6% | +10 | +5.1pp |
| Highest group | 16 | 10.1% | 15.8% | 13 | 9.8% | 14.5% | +3 | +0.3pp |
| Total persons aged 15+ | 158 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 132 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +26 | 0.0pp |