Skip to main content
Community filters
: Beverly Hills (part)
SAL
: Georges River (A)
: Persons

Employment

Travel To Work

Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.

About this topic

Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.

This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.

Interpretation notes

  • Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
  • It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
  • The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.

Key insight

In 2021, working from home was the most common travel method among employed residents in Beverly Hills (part), accounting for 39.1% (1,724 people). This share was higher than Georges River (A) (36.6%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in working from home, which increased by 1,590 people and 36.2 percentage points.

Section overview

Method of travel to work

Beverly Hills (part) - Employed persons (Usual residence)

This table summarises travel to work for Beverly Hills (part) in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Georges River (A) and change since 2016.

Boundary-adjusted comparison

This area boundary has changed from 2016 to 2021. As a result, 2016 values are mapped onto 2021 suburb boundaries using ABS concordance.

Method of travel to work change

Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.

2016
2021

Train

-1,023

-21.8pp

Bus

-54

-1.1pp

Tram

0

0.0pp

Ferry

-3

-0.1pp

Taxi/ride-share

+3

0.0pp

Car - as driver

-993

-19.8pp

Car - as passenger

-38

-0.7pp

Truck

-11

-0.2pp

Motorbike

-7

-0.2pp

Bicycle

-5

-0.1pp

Walked only

-60

-1.3pp

Other

+14

+0.4pp

Worked at home

+1,590

+36.2pp

Did not go to work

+393

+9.2pp

Not stated

-28

-0.6pp

Data table

Travel To Work for Beverly Hills (part). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Georges River (A).

Travel To Work for Beverly Hills (part). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Georges River (A).
Travel To Work for Beverly Hills (part). Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Georges River (A).
Category20212016Change
Count%Georges River (A)%Count%Georges River (A)%Countpp
Train2415.5%9.4%1,26427.3%29.7%-1,023-21.8pp
Bus170.4%0.8%711.5%1.5%-54-1.1pp
Tram00.0%0.0%00.0%0.0%00.0pp
Ferry00.0%0.0%30.1%0.0%-3-0.1pp
Taxi/ride-share60.1%0.1%30.1%0.1%+30.0pp
Car - as driver1,44232.7%30.0%2,43552.5%47.9%-993-19.8pp
Car - as passenger1192.7%2.6%1573.4%3.6%-38-0.7pp
Truck200.5%0.4%310.7%0.6%-11-0.2pp
Motorbike110.2%0.3%180.4%0.3%-7-0.2pp
Bicycle50.1%0.1%100.2%0.2%-5-0.1pp
Walked only330.7%2.4%932.0%3.2%-60-1.3pp
Other471.1%0.8%330.7%0.8%+14+0.4pp
Worked at home1,72439.1%36.6%1342.9%3.3%+1,590+36.2pp
Did not go to work73416.6%16.1%3417.4%7.8%+393+9.2pp
Not stated140.3%0.4%420.9%0.9%-28-0.6pp
Total employed persons aged 15+4,413100.0%100.0%4,635100.0%100.0%-2220.0pp