Employment
Travel To Work
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
About this topic
Method of travel to work shows how employed residents usually got to work on Census day, including private vehicle, public transport, active travel, and working from home. It provides a snapshot of commuting behaviour rather than the full transport system.
This topic supports transport and infrastructure planning and helps show how residents access employment. The 2021 results need caution because many parts of Australia were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, which increased working from home and reduced some other travel modes.
Interpretation notes
- Method of travel to work captures the journey to work on Census day, not a person's usual weekly travel pattern.
- It applies only to employed people and is most useful with place of work or car ownership when considering transport access.
- The 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 restrictions in many places, so work-from-home and some travel modes need caution in trend comparisons.
Key insight
In 2021, car driver was the most common travel method among employed residents in Ingle Farm, accounting for 68.2% (2,808 people). This share was lower than Salisbury (C) (70.7%). Since 2016, the biggest change was in car driver, which increased by 406 people, while its share fell by 0.3 percentage points.
Section overview
Method of travel to work
Ingle Farm - Employed persons (Usual residence)
This table summarises travel to work for Ingle Farm in 2021 for persons, with comparison against Salisbury (C) and change since 2016.
Chart view
Method of travel to work snapshot
2021 distribution by category for Ingle Farm, with comparison markers for Salisbury (C).
Train
Bus
Tram
Ferry
Taxi/ride-share
Car - as driver
Car - as passenger
Truck
Motorbike
Bicycle
Walked only
Other
Worked at home
Did not go to work
Not stated
Method of travel to work change
Absolute change in category counts between 2016 and 2021.
Train
-5
-0.3pp
Bus
-21
-1.8pp
Tram
0
0.0pp
Ferry
0
0.0pp
Taxi/ride-share
+10
+0.2pp
Car - as driver
+406
-0.3pp
Car - as passenger
+25
0.0pp
Truck
+4
0.0pp
Motorbike
-8
-0.3pp
Bicycle
+3
+0.1pp
Walked only
+2
-0.1pp
Other
+6
-0.1pp
Worked at home
+157
+3.5pp
Did not go to work
+55
-0.1pp
Not stated
-23
-0.7pp
Data table
Travel To Work for Ingle Farm. Method of travel to work. 2021 and 2016 counts, percentages, and change compared with Salisbury (C).
| Category | 2021 | 2016 | Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Salisbury (C)% | Count | % | Salisbury (C)% | Count | pp | |
| Train | 18 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 23 | 0.7% | 3.3% | -5 | -0.3pp |
| Bus | 296 | 7.2% | 4.5% | 317 | 9.0% | 4.0% | -21 | -1.8pp |
| Tram | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Ferry | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0pp |
| Taxi/ride-share | 16 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 6 | 0.2% | 0.2% | +10 | +0.2pp |
| Car - as driver | 2,808 | 68.2% | 70.7% | 2,402 | 68.5% | 71.3% | +406 | -0.3pp |
| Car - as passenger | 188 | 4.6% | 5.0% | 163 | 4.6% | 5.0% | +25 | 0.0pp |
| Truck | 21 | 0.5% | 0.5% | 17 | 0.5% | 0.7% | +4 | 0.0pp |
| Motorbike | 23 | 0.6% | 0.4% | 31 | 0.9% | 0.4% | -8 | -0.3pp |
| Bicycle | 11 | 0.3% | 0.3% | 8 | 0.2% | 0.4% | +3 | +0.1pp |
| Walked only | 35 | 0.8% | 1.0% | 33 | 0.9% | 1.2% | +2 | -0.1pp |
| Other | 58 | 1.4% | 1.3% | 52 | 1.5% | 1.3% | +6 | -0.1pp |
| Worked at home | 233 | 5.7% | 5.7% | 76 | 2.2% | 2.0% | +157 | +3.5pp |
| Did not go to work | 400 | 9.7% | 9.3% | 345 | 9.8% | 9.4% | +55 | -0.1pp |
| Not stated | 12 | 0.3% | 0.5% | 35 | 1.0% | 0.9% | -23 | -0.7pp |
| Total employed persons aged 15+ | 4,119 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 3,508 | 100.0% | 100.0% | +611 | 0.0pp |